Transparency?

Open and general public discussions about things outside of Lakewood.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Post Reply
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Transparency?

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Fast and Furious’ Documents: Executive Privilege Only Applies If the President Was Personally Involved... according to Judge Andrew Napolitano.. I love the transparency of this admin. This hype and blame admin has failed to bring change. The only hope that we have is 2016.
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Transparency?

Post by Stephen Eisel »

ryan costa
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:31 pm

Re: Transparency?

Post by ryan costa »

the entire investigation is a waste of time. either end the "Fast and Furious" program or don't. hurry the hell up.
"Is this flummery” — Archie Goodwin
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Transparency?

Post by Stephen Eisel »

1,000 deaths including a US border agent.. Let's give 2,000 weapons to drug cartel members and see what happens... Hope and Change that you can believe in... Sad!
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Transparency?

Post by Stephen Eisel »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 54gOgJxIRQ


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBIWSyoe ... re=related

oops :oops: Watergate with murder.. This is not good.. But the msm will ignore it.. It's a conflict of agenda..
kate e parker

Re: Transparency?

Post by kate e parker »

Stephen Eisel wrote:oops :oops: Watergate with murder.. This is not good.. But the msm will ignore it.. It's a conflict of agenda..


it's funny how some things are worth breathless reporting and investigating such as the valerie plame incident but things like this are considered a waste of time.
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Transparency?

Post by Stephen Eisel »

more transparency

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... -documents

Attorney General Eric Holder and his Department of Justice have asked a federal court to indefinitely delay a lawsuit brought by watchdog group Judicial Watch. The lawsuit seeks the enforcement of open records requests relating to Operation Fast and Furious, as required by law.

Judicial Watch had filed, on June 22, 2012, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking all documents relating to Operation Fast and Furious and “specifically [a]ll records subject to the claim of executive privilege invoked by President Barack Obama on or about June 20, 2012.”

The administration has refused to comply with Judicial Watch’s FOIA request, and in mid-September the group filed a lawsuit challenging Holder’s denial. That lawsuit remains ongoing but within the past week President Barack Obama’s administration filed what’s called a “motion to stay” the suit. Such a motion is something that if granted would delay the lawsuit indefinitely.
Post Reply