sharon kinsella wrote:
I just find it interesting that the options and answers are only, I can't do anything, let's close the parks.
Not a can do attitude.
Sharon, your circumstances illustrate the need to televise public meetings in Lakewood. Council members should be clamoring to have their board and committee meetings available to the community. Other communities do it and we could do it - we choose not to. However, that is off topic.
Councilman Demro provided those in attendance with a brief history of the problem, the supporting documentation from last year's meetings, conclusions and action steps. Those meetings and documents were a joint effort by Demro, Ward 2 and Councilman Butler, Ward 1.
This community has 3 at large representatives. Councilman Fitzgerald arrived late and was immediately recognized by Demro. Councilpersons Antonio and Dever were not in attendance. The mayor was not in attendance, but Director Beno and several members of his staff were. It takes 4 councilmembers to initiate an action and if the mayor vetoes it then it takes 5 to override the veto.
As for closing the parks, Councilman Demro was asked a question and gave a clear and honest answer. He did not advocate closing the parks, instead he provided the bones of a plan to consolidate green space in an effort to provide the same acreage to citizens in fewer places as a means of helping the parks department manage time, material and resources.
We have a problem and not just one. I don't envy Lakewood City Council their jobs. Everyone in Lakewood needs to be paying close attention to who is leading this city, their vision and ask themselves how they can help. It's all hands on deck time.
“The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.â€