Mark Kindt wrote:Thank you, Ms. Conant for your voice of reason and calm.
I am disappointed that this thread was started at all. It reads like a script from a Fox News Broadcast and commences with a false, but provocative premise and then lapses into various partisan rants unrelated to Lakewood.
The Moderators might want to consider moving the thread to the Global Discussion thread.
There is increasing pressure to censure the internet and unpopular opinions. These two law professors think the Chinese Fascist Party is on the right track:
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... et/610549/
Of course if someone tried to censure their article or prohibit them from having an opinion they would be outraged. It's the other person who should be censured.
That type of thinking is not new. It's only during the last two hundred years or so that the free expression of ideas was incorporated into law and the public conscience. Will constitutional law be one of the casualties of the virus? Time will tell.
I understand that the title of this post make some people uncomfortable. Hard choices are always uncomfortable.
Who gets the heart transplant? Is it the 75 year old or the 20 year old?
If you have enough serum to save 5 people but 10 are sick, who gets saved?
Is triage immoral?
Those choices are made every day. Someone lives and someone dies. That's life. I am just pointing out that in the case of COVID 19 we have made the choice to sacrifice the young. Fifty years ago the choice would have been different.
The pandemic of 1968 killed about 100,000 people. Adjusted for current population it killed about 170,000 people.
What did we do as a people?
People washed their hands, practiced social distancing and used alcohol wipes to clean surfaces. That's it.
They didn't throw 40 million people out of work.
They didn't bankrupt pension plans and 401(k) plans.
They didn't crash the stock market.
They didn't destroy 1 million small businesses.
They didn't throw billions of people into poverty.
They didn't destroy the future of an entire generation.
They didn't drive cities and states into bankruptcy.
They didn't bankrupt universities and colleges.
They didn't send SWAT teams out to arrest people for taking a walk.
The Hong Kong flu was dangerous primarily to people over 65, much like COVID. So in 1968 older people were asked to self isolate. And they did.
I haven't done a study on it but I don't think anyone followed the Cuomo Plan: Isolate the young and healthy and seed nursing homes with people who have the virus.