Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
Brian Essi
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am
Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
So Rick Uldricks, the Client of Attorney Jay Carson (Chairman of Build Lakewood Rebranded as Voters for Progress PAC), tried to violate the Constitutionally Protected Free Speech of two citizen bloggers by outing their identities through issuing a subpoena.
In the case in which Uldricks was characterized in court filings as a "serial harasser" of citizens for their political views, the Court quashed the subpoena dealing a crippling blow to Jay Carson and his law partners' concocted claims.
The Court stated in its ruling: "The Unidentified Defendants were engaging in constitutionally protected speech."
It is only a matter of time before the Uldricks entire sham lawsuit concocted by Dark Money Insider and Summers/Bullock operative Jay Carson is thrown out of court as completely frivolous. I predict a ruling not too long from now in which the Court issues a similar ruling in favor of Jim O'Bryan and the Lakewood Observer
As others have said, which bears repeating, Insider Carson, et al are bullies trying to shut people up. Example: Summers banned the free press from City Hall.
Thankfully we have Courts to protect us from our local government Insiders.
Let Freedom Ring! Vote AGAINST 64 to Save Free Speech in Lakewood!
In the case in which Uldricks was characterized in court filings as a "serial harasser" of citizens for their political views, the Court quashed the subpoena dealing a crippling blow to Jay Carson and his law partners' concocted claims.
The Court stated in its ruling: "The Unidentified Defendants were engaging in constitutionally protected speech."
It is only a matter of time before the Uldricks entire sham lawsuit concocted by Dark Money Insider and Summers/Bullock operative Jay Carson is thrown out of court as completely frivolous. I predict a ruling not too long from now in which the Court issues a similar ruling in favor of Jim O'Bryan and the Lakewood Observer
As others have said, which bears repeating, Insider Carson, et al are bullies trying to shut people up. Example: Summers banned the free press from City Hall.
Thankfully we have Courts to protect us from our local government Insiders.
Let Freedom Ring! Vote AGAINST 64 to Save Free Speech in Lakewood!
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
So does this same law protect the unnamed people here on the Observation Deck (despite the bogus Deck rules that claim real, full names need to be used)?
Is that why the Deck is granting immunity to certain people in order to protect their names and identities? Is this to help them aid in the UpperDeckers push toward the City and other future endeavors?
At least, that is what it appears to be.
Is that why the Deck is granting immunity to certain people in order to protect their names and identities? Is this to help them aid in the UpperDeckers push toward the City and other future endeavors?
At least, that is what it appears to be.
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
-
cmager
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:33 am
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Mr. Rossen, you're just not that resourceful, are you?Corey Rossen wrote:So does this same law protect the unnamed people here on the Observation Deck (despite the bogus Deck rules that claim real, full names need to be used)? Is that why the Deck is granting immunity to certain people in order to protect their names and identities? Is this to help them aid in the UpperDeckers push toward the City and other future endeavors? At least, that is what it appears to be.
Say my name. https://youtu.be/N9F04l172OA
-
Brian Essi
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Mr. Rossen,Corey Rossen wrote:So does this same law protect the unnamed people here on the Observation Deck (despite the bogus Deck rules that claim real, full names need to be used)?
Is that why the Deck is granting immunity to certain people in order to protect their names and identities? Is this to help them aid in the UpperDeckers push toward the City and other future endeavors?
At least, that is what it appears to be.
The law even protects you.
But the Deck could exclude you with the stroke of a delete key since your are here by privilege, not as a matter of any right.
Too bad you and JFF chose to exclude people from their right to free speech at your little picnic at Lakewood Park, an event at public place sponsored/promoted by your Insider pals at the Cleveland Clinic (front and center in your ad); Jay Carson's fraudulent Insiders "For 64" PAC (Front and Center in your ad), the City of Lakewood (excludes free press from City Hall), Lakewood City Schools, Jay Carson's law firm Wegman Hassler, et al. All of whom hate free speech along with you, yet you are all protected by the law.
You appear to be a shill with a tin cup ready for your pay off from the new Fake Foundation funded with stolen money they use to bribe you.
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
I believe the line from the kinda famous movie is "Say my name, b!tch."cmager wrote: Say my name.
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
-
Amy Martin
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:30 am
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Please ignore the troll and it will eventually go away . . .
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Again with bringing a charity into it.Brian Essi wrote:Mr. Rossen,Corey Rossen wrote:So does this same law protect the unnamed people here on the Observation Deck (despite the bogus Deck rules that claim real, full names need to be used)?
Is that why the Deck is granting immunity to certain people in order to protect their names and identities? Is this to help them aid in the UpperDeckers push toward the City and other future endeavors?
At least, that is what it appears to be.
The law even protects you.
But the Deck could exclude you with the stroke of a delete key since your are here by privilege, not as a matter of any right.
Too bad you and JFF chose to exclude people from their right to free speech at your little picnic at Lakewood Park, an event at public place sponsored/promoted by your Insider pals at the Cleveland Clinic (front and center in your ad); Jay Carson's fraudulent Insiders "For 64" PAC (Front and Center in your ad), the City of Lakewood (excludes free press from City Hall), Lakewood City Schools, Jay Carson's law firm Wegman Hassler, et al. All of whom hate free speech along with you, yet you are all protected by the law.
You appear to be a shill with a tin cup ready for your pay off from the new Fake Foundation funded with stolen money they use to bribe you.
You must have a better approach than resorting to this each and every time.
I would have loved to have your SL group in the event, but they took a route that did not favor entrance into the event. I spoke with the President of your group and another memeber and we were all in understanding. Their free speech was not blocked, it was quieted by their own foot in their mouth.
Hey, something I meant to bring up but thought I would let you spew your spew without interrupting you personally. Oh well, you put an end to that...please tell me how you are qualified, yet seemed to fail to interpret simple and accepted accounting practices? Mr. Anderson pointed out your deficiencies but you were very quick to disregard them and move along. Where did you get your Accounting license?
I'm sorry if you don't like the fact that your Observer organization cannot follow the rules you have written for them but that has nothing to do with me. Take it up with the admins and founders.
"Keep on hating and your world will be a hateful place." Doug E. Houser
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
-
Brian Essi
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Let Freedom Ring!Brian Essi wrote:So Rick Uldricks, the Client of Attorney Jay Carson (Chairman of Build Lakewood Rebranded as Voters for Progress PAC), tried to violate the Constitutionally Protected Free Speech of two citizen bloggers by outing their identities through issuing a subpoena.
In the case in which Uldricks was characterized in court filings as a "serial harasser" of citizens for their political views, the Court quashed the subpoena dealing a crippling blow to Jay Carson and his law partners' concocted claims.
The Court stated in its ruling: "The Unidentified Defendants were engaging in constitutionally protected speech."
It is only a matter of time before the Uldricks entire sham lawsuit concocted by Dark Money Insider and Summers/Bullock operative Jay Carson is thrown out of court as completely frivolous. I predict a ruling not too long from now in which the Court issues a similar ruling in favor of Jim O'Bryan and the Lakewood Observer
As others have said, which bears repeating, Insider Carson, et al are bullies trying to shut people up. Example: Summers banned the free press from City Hall.
Thankfully we have Courts to protect us from our local government Insiders.
Let Freedom Ring! Vote AGAINST 64 to Save Free Speech in Lakewood!
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Rules are rules, don't keep breaking them or...oh, yeah, or nothing will happen. Carry on.Amy Martin wrote:Please ignore the troll and it will eventually go away . . .
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
So you threaten me with this because you are in bed with the Deck?Brian Essi wrote:
But the Deck could exclude you with the stroke of a delete key since your are here by privilege, not as a matter of any right.
I have been following rules, always have. Check your rules. The only time I break them is when I am using a quote of one your rule breaking UpperDeckers. Otherwise I'm guessing you do not know your own rules. (Personal attacks, that's your specialty by the way - a definite rule infringement, but in your case it doesn't carry a penalty.)
So you mean to tell me that an organization who is fighting for freedom of speech and touting that they are the only option for free speech is going to "delete someone" for not bowing down to them. Wow! You must be proud of what you are standing and fighting for. If only you could hear yourself.
"You can't make this stuff up."
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
-
Brian Essi
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Let Freedom Ring!
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Brian Essi wrote:Let Freedom Ring!
It is funny to me that you do not see the hypocrisy and irony in you saying "Let Freedom Ring" only minutes after posting...
Maybe, just maybe someday, you will see the irony and hypocrisy that I see. Maybe.Brian Essi wrote: But the Deck could exclude you with the stroke of a delete key since your are here by privilege, not as a matter of any right.
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
-
Brian Essi
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Let Freedom Ring!
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
-
Marguerite Harkness
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 10:42 am
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
More lies by troll Corey, but what would you EXPECT??
Save Lakewood Hospital PAID for a booth at Jordan's Family Foundation because we believed (right or wrong) that his little foundation might be beneficial to the health of some individuals.
He did NOT speak to the chairman of Save Lakewood Hospital.
He and SLH did NOT come to "any kind of mutual agreement".
He just shut us out, period.
Save Lakewood Hospital PAID for a booth at Jordan's Family Foundation because we believed (right or wrong) that his little foundation might be beneficial to the health of some individuals.
He did NOT speak to the chairman of Save Lakewood Hospital.
He and SLH did NOT come to "any kind of mutual agreement".
He just shut us out, period.
- Jim O'Bryan
- Posts: 14196
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
- Location: Lakewood
- Contact:
Re: Court Quashes Summers/Build Lakewood Supporter Uldricks' Attempt to Violate Constitutional Right to Free Speech
Corey Rossen wrote:
So you threaten me with this because you are in bed with the Deck?
Corey
I just saw this who threatened you? What was the threat?
.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident
"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg
"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Lakewood Resident
"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg
"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama