Proof That CCF/LHA Had A $673,136 Lobbying Budget!

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

kate e parker

Re: Proof That CCF/LHA Had A $673,136 Lobbying Budget!

Post by kate e parker »

If anyone can find any tangible evidence..
and so goes every thread on the deck
Jared Denman
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:30 pm

Re: Proof That CCF/LHA Had A $673,136 Lobbying Budget!

Post by Jared Denman »

You're absolutely right Bridget. The Michigan address listed in the "Veto 64" filing was not listed on ANY of the businesses in Michigan registered as "Great Lakes Strategy." We know according to the pre-campaign filing that Lori mentioned that Butler already has a penchant for listing addresses for his law firm other than the actual location. So it's no stretch to conclude that- based upon the documents- that Butler just threw down an address as a subterfuge to avoid scrutiny.
Jared Denman
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:30 pm

Re: Proof That CCF/LHA Had A $673,136 Lobbying Budget!

Post by Jared Denman »

Ms. Parker... taking something I said out of context is not only disingenuous, it is intellectually lazy. If you viewed my other posts and those of Lori Allen, Bridget Conant, and Brian Essi you will see that there is so much evidence it is mind boggling. Do not mistake attempts at being reflectively objective as lack of evidence. Slaves have been made of entire nations in this way.
Post Reply